Evaluation

Evaluation


Presentation / 5 points

1 - 2 points

• lacked clarity and detail
• provided no reasons for their decision
• presentation did not engage the audience

3 points

• provided one side of the issue
• presented some evidence in an organised way

4 - 5 points

• presentation was clear and organised
• different perspectives were outlined
• both facts and opinions were provided
• presentation was creative & dynamic

Teamwork / 5 points

1 - 2 points

• unequal participation
• lacked direction
• disconnected

3 points

• activities were completed as a team
• some members did more work than others

4 - 5 points

• each member evenly contributed to all activities
• group members have taken responsibility for their roles
• members actively helped each other when necessary

Journal Content / 10 Points

1 - 4 points

• did not complete all activities within the process stage
• tasks were rushed though
• journal was not organised

5 - 7 points

• tasks were completed, but displayed limited effort
• journal was somewhat organised

8 - 10 points

• completed all activities
• submitted work was of a high standard
• took time to produce creative and detailed work
• organised journal in a neat and structured way

Research and thoroughness / 5 points

1 - 2 points

• journal and presentation showed lack of research
• information from research was inaccurate

3 points

• the journal and presentation display some amount of research
• demonstrates some understanding of the issue

4 - 5 points

• very well researched
• research is clearly shown throughout the journal and presentation
• demonstrates a clear understanding of the planning, the journey and the perspectives regarding the issue